TSTP Solution File: SEV048^5 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : SEV048^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 04:11:50 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   4 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   69 (  24 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  113 (  12   ~;   0   |;  16   &;  80   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   88 (  88   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   41 (   6   ^  18   !;  16   ?;  41   :)
%                                         (   1  !>;   0  ?*;   0  @-;   0  @+)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(func_def_3,type,
    sK0: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    sK1: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK2: ( ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o ) > $i > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    ph4: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(f23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f22]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    $true != $true,
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( $true
   != ( ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : $true
      @ ( sK1
        @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : $true )
      @ ( sK2
        @ ^ [Y0: $i > $o,Y1: $i > $o] : $true ) ) ),
    inference(primitive_instantiation,[],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
      ( $true
     != ( X0 @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) @ ( sK2 @ X0 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( X0 @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
      & ( $true
        = ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) @ ( sK2 @ X0 ) ) )
      & ( $true
       != ( X0 @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) @ ( sK2 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f8,f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
      ( ? [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o] :
          ( ( $true
            = ( X0 @ X2 @ X1 ) )
          & ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
           != $true ) )
     => ( ( $true
          = ( X0 @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) ) )
        & ( $true
          = ( X0 @ ( sK0 @ X0 ) @ ( sK2 @ X0 ) ) )
        & ( $true
         != ( X0 @ ( sK1 @ X0 ) @ ( sK2 @ X0 ) ) ) ) ),
    introduced(choice_axiom,[]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
    ? [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( $true
        = ( X0 @ X2 @ X1 ) )
      & ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X3 )
        = $true )
      & ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
    ? [X2: $i > $o,X1: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $true )
      & ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
        = $true )
      & ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X3 )
       != $true ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ! [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
    ? [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X3 )
       != $true )
      & ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
        = $true )
      & ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
      ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          & ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 )
            = $true ) )
       => ( ( X0 @ X1 @ X3 )
          = $true ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
      ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
          & ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
       => ( X0 @ X1 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
      ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o] :
        ( ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
          & ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
       => ( X0 @ X1 @ X3 ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ? [X0: ( $i > $o ) > ( $i > $o ) > $o] :
    ! [X1: $i > $o,X2: $i > $o,X3: $i > $o] :
      ( ( ( X0 @ X2 @ X3 )
        & ( X0 @ X1 @ X2 ) )
     => ( X0 @ X1 @ X3 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cTHM120_pme) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : SEV048^5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.10/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Sun May 19 18:28:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.35  This is a TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR problem
% 0.15/0.35  Running vampire_ho --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_hol --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.37  % (15013)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (15015)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (15017)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (15016)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (15019)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (15017)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.15/0.37  % (15017)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37  % (15017)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.37  % (15017)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.15/0.37  % (15017)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.15/0.37  
% 0.15/0.37  % (15017)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.15/0.37  % (15017)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.37  % (15017)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.15/0.37  % (15017)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37  % (15017)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37  % (15016)First to succeed.
% 0.15/0.37  % (15015)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.37  % (15015)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37  % (15015)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.37  % (15015)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.15/0.37  
% 0.15/0.37  
% 0.15/0.37  % (15015)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.37  % (15015)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.37  % (15015)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.15/0.37  % (15015)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37  % (15015)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37  % (15020)lrs+10_1:1_bet=on:cnfonf=off:fd=off:hud=5:inj=on:i=3:si=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/3Mi)
% 0.15/0.37  % (15013)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.15/0.37  % (15016)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.15/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.37  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.37  % (15016)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37  % (15016)Version: Vampire 4.8 HO - Sledgehammer schedules (2023-10-19)
% 0.15/0.37  % (15016)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.15/0.37  
% 0.15/0.37  % (15016)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.15/0.37  % (15016)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.37  % (15016)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.15/0.37  % (15016)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37  % (15016)------------------------------
% 0.15/0.37  % (15012)Success in time 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.37  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------